印媒:尽管具有军事优势,为什么中国会打不赢印度?
每当印度和中国在边界上对峙时,人们就会立即想到这个问题,那就是谁的军事实力更强大?显然是中国。
中国国防实力令印度相形见绌,军费预算为1520亿美元,而印度只有区区510亿美元,中国军费是印度军费的3倍。
然而,这并不意味着中国能制服印度。
两国政府认为,下一场印中冲突将是范围有限,持续时间短的,而不是一场旷日持久的大规模战争。
这是因为两国都具备足够强大的核威慑能力。
印度网友评论:
Calvin Nam
India thought they will win in 1962, result is a humiliating defeat. China is reacting exactly the same way it did in 1962, in case you guys don”t see it. In a war today, India will lose in another humiliating defeat… Indians may say, ”We are not like 1962”.. but do know.. neither is China not like 1962. In fact, China”s military tech is way way superior against India today, closing in on USA. India is basically giving China a chance to test their new weapons… Good luck!! Don”t live in ..
印度本以为能打赢1962年那场战争的,结果遭受耻辱性失败
中国现在的反应跟1962年那时候一模一样
当今战争,印度会遭受另一场羞辱性的失败的。
印度人也许会说,现在不是1962年了。
殊不知中国也不是1962年的中国啊
事实上,当今中国军事科技遥遥领先印度,正在逼近美国
印度这是在跟中国提供一个测试其新武器的机会啊
祝好运吧
Shankarnarayan Sarma
PLA cannot match with Indian Army. Indian Army”s skillness and dedication is superior than PLA.Nobody can challenge our Army
解放军不是印度军队的对手。
印度军队的军事技能在解放军之上
任何人都不该挑战我们的军队
Ramaswami Narayan
Points
It”s incorrect of media to give out military figures
媒体披露军队数据是不对的
jaguar ji
India in short has ability to inflict back 70% of the damage thatChina can do to India..
中国要是对印度造成100点伤害,印度就有能力对其造成70点伤害
B R V Shanbhag
India is not a lame duck. It is like kauravas v/s Pandavas
印度可不是跛脚鸭
Ajit Nair
Where does this article show why china cannot subdue India??
从文章哪里可以看出中国制服不了印度了?
Vikram
Its very easy to start a war…. but not easy to finish it….. china must understand that this is not 1962….china will also be destroyed and dusted….. and their aim to become a superpower will be thrown in the gutters…..India also has ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, missile defence system, anti satellite missiles etc…. we will ensure that each and every city that you had built all these years is vapourised…. so stop your aggression and come to negotiating table….
开战倒是简单,要收场就难了
中国务必明白一点,那就是现在不是1962年
中国也会被摧毁的
他们崛起为超级大国的梦想将会破碎。
印度也有洲际导弹,也有巡航导弹、导弹防御系统、反卫星导弹等
我们会确保你们这些年来辛苦建设起来的每一座城市都会被摧毁
停止你的侵略步伐,回到谈判桌上来吧
Jesse Nxt
useless post… no relation with heading and its content…
Sensibleopines
China cannot win because china has made a lot of potential enemies recently so it cannot dedicate its entire military strength towards India
中国之所以打不赢,那是因为最近结下了太多敌人,无法把全部军力用来对付印度
sasikumar
In fact I could not figure out what the author meant; China has such and such and India has such and such; only that much; the time spent to read seemed a waste. pl answer why China can”t beat India; we are anxious to hear!
我没搞明白作者的意思啊
就是罗列了中国军队的装备,中国有这么多,印度有这么多
请告诉我,为什么中国打不败印度,我们很想听啊?
Rakesh Pant
Can you guys learn to write complete articles? The headline does not match anywhere with the contents
能把文章写完整吗?
标题和内容不匹配啊
vijay
china cannot afford war with india since india is a very big market for chinese products. if china goes for a war with india, then it will be at much bigger losing stage.
中国承担不起一场对印战争,那是因为对中国商品来说,印度是一个非常庞大的市场。
如果中国打印度,那么损失会很大
H K Doshi Doshi
This time if war happened India must take back our land of Akshai Chin & try to free Tibet like Bangladesh.
这次要是打起来了
印度一定要把阿克赛钦拿回来,并尽量解放XZ
Ganda Garlic
Relax !!! We can”t do anything, China is ramping up to fight America,
放松!
我们只能听天由命
中国这是以打美国的标准来加强军队建设的
Anil Kumar
If Chinese are right, why are afraid to talk to India and give evidence and resolve, than daily barking like dog.
既然中国人是对的,为什么害怕与印度谈判,为什么不拿出证据来
而是天天在那里鬼叫鬼叫的
Nandini Upreti
Still India should be well prepared.
印度还是要好好准备啊
patel
All thanks to Congress!!
多亏了国大党!
Rishi
There is no correlation between the title of the article and the content. Just some statistics.
文章标题和内容没啥关系,无非是罗列了一些统计数据
Anup Singh
Could America subdue Taliban? NO. So numbers don”t matter. Biggest fall out will be ban on Chinese imports and that is worth $50 billion per year surplus lost. Good for India if there”s a war and India immediately bans all imports from China.
美国制服得了塔利班吗?
制服不了!
数量并不重要
最严重的后果是封杀中国货
这可是每年500亿美元的损失
要是打仗,对印度是有利的,印度可以立即停止进口中国商品
发布于 2024-09-28 22:44:16 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 14:39:19 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 17:18:14 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 19:38:56 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 16:23:59 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 00:21:23 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 22:57:57 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 18:07:05 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 03:00:00 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 22:46:30 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 02:52:35 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 22:21:18 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 23:13:07 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 20:28:31 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 06:51:31 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 00:46:52 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 03:14:33 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 22:41:26 回复
发布于 2024-09-28 23:15:47 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 00:02:35 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 00:06:37 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 02:24:54 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 04:52:52 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 00:09:50 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 00:02:17 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 05:31:46 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 01:55:02 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 11:41:00 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 07:39:13 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 06:01:38 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 13:32:54 回复
发布于 2024-09-29 06:25:26 回复